6 July 2020 by


Protesters in Hong Kong. Credit score: The Guardian. 

It has been a quiet week within the courts from a human rights perspective. The Supreme Courtroom gave judgment on a divorce case and a social safety fraud, and while the Courtroom of Enchantment and Excessive Courtroom have been extra forthcoming when it comes to the variety of selections made, household legislation and industrial instances dominated. Authorized buffs could nonetheless have an interest to notice Scales v Motor Insurers’ Bureau [2020] EWHC 1747 (QB), by which the Excessive Courtroom utilized Spanish legislation in a street site visitors accident case, while movie star watchers and college students revising for his or her civil litigation exams could recognize seeing how the court docket utilized the check from Denton to grant Johnny Christopher Depp II reduction from sanctions (who knew there was a Johnny Christopher Depp I?) – Depp v News Group Newspapers Ltd & Ors [2020] EWHC 1734 (QB).

A quiet week within the courts didn’t nonetheless prolong to a quiet week within the information…

  • China imposed its new safety legislation on Hong Kong. The legislation was permitted by legislators regardless of the actual fact it was not made out there for them to learn prematurely. The precise provisions of the legislation are lined in some element by the BBC here, however quantity to a full frontal assault on established authorized protections within the territory. In response to the prospect of trials with no jury performed by politically appointed judges, the UK took steps to afford citizenship rights to three million holders of British Nationwide Abroad passports.
  • While protesting the lack of jury trials in Hong Kong, the Authorities took steps to limit the proper to trial by jury within the UK. The measures, which the Authorities assures are to be non permanent, purpose to assist clear the growing backlog of prison instances brought on by a long-standing lack of court docket capability. The scenario has been additional exacerbated by the closure of courts throughout the Covid-19 pandemic.
  • The Industrial Courtroom dominated in opposition to Nicolas Maduro’s try to have the Financial institution of England launch shops of Venezuelan gold held within the financial institution’s Threadneedle Road vault – Deutsche Bank AG London Branch v Receivers Appointed By the Court & Ors [2020] EWHC 1721 (Comm). The UK recognises the opposition of Juan Guaido, nonetheless Mr Maduro had claimed that circumstances on the bottom, together with the UK’s ongoing diplomatic presence in Caracas, made him the international locations de facto chief.
  • In response to an increase within the variety of coronavirus instances in Leicester, the Authorities launched a neighborhood “lockdown” within the metropolis. Ministers appeared to concede that restrictions have been in the meanwhile successfully voluntary, and prompt they might search to carry ahead secondary laws giving the lockdown authorized impact within the subsequent few weeks.
  • A former skilled cricketer didn’t have his conviction for rape overturned – Hepburn v R. [2020] EWCA Crim 820 (30 June 2020). Alex Hepburn mounted his attraction on the premise that textual content messages he had despatched previous to the offence by which he mentioned collaborating in a sport along with his buddies to gather as many sexual encounters as doable mustn’t have been positioned earlier than the court docket as proof in opposition to him. His counsel argued that they have been unfairly prejudicial as they didn’t present he was prepared to have intercourse with out consent. The Courtroom of Enchantment held that their inclusion didn’t make his conviction unsafe.

On the UK Human Rights Weblog:

  • Rosalind English considers how the courts method the idea of “finest pursuits” when an grownup making a proposed medical donation with the potential to trigger lasting hurt to the donor lacks capability (here), and the case of University Hospital and Warwickshire NHS Trust v K and one other [2020] EWCOP 31 (here).